Introduction Paragraph udiggggg :)

-
Many people have different opinions when it comes to airport security.In 2017, 3,324 (84 percent) of the total firearms discovered were loaded. Could you imagine what could happen if airport Security didn’t confiscate those firearms. Some believe that there should be more protocols added, while others think that that the some of the protocols now are unnecessary. There could be many possible outcomes if airport security does not follow their protocol when it comes to checking passengers’ baggage. It only takes one insane person to make a risk and hurt many of innocent people. Airport security is rigorous and detailed about what can be allowed to be brought into the plane. They prevent illegal drugs, terror threats, and human trafficking from entering the United States. Even though TSA officers are highly trained, Drug Traffickers still find a way to smuggle drugs through airport security. If the airport security were not doing its job of checking passengers and their baggage, then this would allow many dangerous people to board an airplane leaving many of innocent people at high risk. Since 9/11, the most significant terror attack done to the United States on its soil, airport security has changed dramatically.  The TSA has many employees that are in charge of detecting any signs of possible harms working every day.  Many passengers complain that airport security line is too long and the new systems are unnecessary. These kinds of travelers do not comprehend the importance of security.  Airport security prevents the entrance of drug trafficking, and human trafficking, terroristic threats from coming into the United States.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

College is A Waste Of Time

-
The 4 pillars of an argument are Argumentative essay are Thesis statement, Evidence, Refutation and Concluding statement. I think in the first paragraph the thesis statement would be "I believe higher education is broken" which can be the writers opinion.Evidence which is based of facts and reliable source.The author provides evidence by quoting famous sociology professors.Then he gives us more evidence in passage 5 with his opinion on success of people who never graduated college.People like :Ellen Degeneres, Steve Jobs, and Michael Dell.The author is trying to persuade you with the facts and evidence he is bringing to the table.He wants you to eventually agree with him.Refutation is in paragraph nine. It says "Of course, some people want a formal education". He says not everybody should leave college and that it mainly depends on the career and path your pursuing.Refutation is in the passage because he is challenging and acknowledging the other side of the argumen
Read more

Critical Response

-
Image
The writer's general subject is whether or not violence is good or bad for a developing child. The purpose of the writer's argument is to show the benefits of exposing your children to violent content. The writer's position is that violence helps mold a child into an individual who can control their rage better, and can even help them to be well rounded individuals. The writer uses opinions more than fact to prove his point. He uses self-experience to explain his plight. The evidence the writer presents is usage of Melanie Moore P.h.D. from Standford University to back up his claims and his own account of personal experiences. Personal experiences have an impact on convincing somebody that violent media is good for kids ,but cant persuade somebody all the way. He needs to find stronger and more convincing sources that violent media helps kids. It would help the audience understand where he's coming from and make it more relatable. The example of the tw
Read more