Critical Response

-

The writer's general subject is whether or not violence is good or bad for a developing child. The purpose of the writer's argument is to show the benefits of exposing your children to violent content. The writer's position is that violence helps mold a child into an individual who can control their rage better, and can even help them to be well rounded individuals.

The writer uses opinions more than fact to prove his point. He uses self-experience to explain his plight. The evidence the writer presents is usage of Melanie Moore P.h.D. from Standford University to back up his claims and his own account of personal experiences. Personal experiences have an impact on convincing somebody that violent media is good for kids ,but cant persuade somebody all the way. He needs to find stronger and more convincing sources that violent media helps kids. It would help the audience understand where he's coming from and make it more relatable.

The example of the two girls that Gerald Jones talks about is still a doubt. We don't know if that is true or not. We just have to trust him and take his word for it. That not enough to persuade the audience that violent is helpful for the kids. I for sure don't think the media covers these violent acts fairly. Some aren't even covered at all. The media and the government hide many things from us citizens. The images used by the media are designed for us to believe it and not think about the other side of the story. They try to blind us of the truth. Which can also be very bad, cause we deserve to know the truth and the whole story on any violent disaster.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction Paragraph udiggggg :)

-
Image
Many people have different opinions when it comes to airport security. In 2017, 3,324 (84 percent) of the total firearms discovered were loaded. Could you imagine what could happen if airport Security didn’t confiscate those firearms.  Some believe that there should be more protocols added, while others think that that the some of the protocols now are unnecessary. There could be many possible outcomes if airport security does not follow their protocol when it comes to checking passengers’ baggage. It only takes one insane person to make a risk and hurt many of innocent people. Airport security is rigorous and detailed about what can be allowed to be brought into the plane. They prevent illegal drugs, terror threats, and human trafficking from entering the United States. Even though TSA officers are highly trained, Drug Traffickers still find a way to smuggle drugs through airport security. If the airport security were not doing its job of checking passengers and their b
Read more

College is A Waste Of Time

-
The 4 pillars of an argument are Argumentative essay are Thesis statement, Evidence, Refutation and Concluding statement. I think in the first paragraph the thesis statement would be "I believe higher education is broken" which can be the writers opinion.Evidence which is based of facts and reliable source.The author provides evidence by quoting famous sociology professors.Then he gives us more evidence in passage 5 with his opinion on success of people who never graduated college.People like :Ellen Degeneres, Steve Jobs, and Michael Dell.The author is trying to persuade you with the facts and evidence he is bringing to the table.He wants you to eventually agree with him.Refutation is in paragraph nine. It says "Of course, some people want a formal education". He says not everybody should leave college and that it mainly depends on the career and path your pursuing.Refutation is in the passage because he is challenging and acknowledging the other side of the argumen
Read more